UNCOVERED: Documents show how KYC-failures by 4 commercial banks aided N30 billion investment scam

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

 

It was also discovered in practical terms that all the Cooperative’s accounts were operated by a sole signatory, Uno Michael Eke, with BVN 22178917780. The same Michael Uno Eke has several personal bank accounts which investors to his scheme claimed were used to warehouse funds diverted from the Cooperative’s accounts. He has two accounts with Keystone Bank; one a domiciliary account, the other a joint savings account with Essien Enobong.

Subscribers to the MMCS scheme decry what they call regulatory lapses of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and poor risk assessments by commercial banks which in this case turn them into “vehicle of fraud to the detriment of unsuspecting members of the public”. In a petition sent to the National Assembly, the investors want the affected commercial banks to tell them “where the funds of the Cooperative were diverted to”.

They also would want to know why no red flags were ever raised on Micheno Cooperative bank accounts. “If the influx of funds did not attract the attention of the apex bank, at least the volumes of monies (over N25 billion) moved out of the Cooperative’s accounts within 2 months should have attracted the attention of the regulator”, they pondered.

In efforts to speak with someone from MMCS, BUSINESS LEAKS dialed some telephone numbers found on Micheno’s promotional materials. One of the calls connected. When the receiver was asked if he was Micheal Eke, a male voice hastily replied, “God forbid”. The receiver who was identified through Truecaller as MC Mbakara declined to comment on his relationship with Micheno. He excused himself from the phone conversion saying he was busy in the studio doing some recordings.

Another call was to Esther Isek, one of the female models whose photographs and telephone numbers had featured prominently on brochures, handbills and Micheno’s other promotional items. She confirmed being a registered member of the cooperative. Esther said she put her money into the scheme with hopes of making high returns but soon after, it was one story to the other until her investment and those of many others were siphoned. Asked if she knew the whereabouts of Michael Eke, she replied, “The last we heard was that he is in custody.”

When this newspaper contacted Michael on his mobile, it did not appear he was in police net. After his phone rang out for a second time, he switched it off.

Responses from the banks

In a written response to accusations of “regulatory and supervisory lapses”, GTB where Micheno maintained five different accounts gave a breakdown of the transaction history of the embattled investment company. According to the bank, Micheno’s Naira account – 0262809804 “recorded a total turnover of about N21.4 billion (excluding reversals).

A summary of the credit entries into the account shows that funds were received by Micheno from 11,866 “various third parties” (investors) totaling Nineteen Billion, Nine Hundred and Twelve Million, Three Hundred and Thirty-Eight Thousand, Eight Hundred and Ninety Nine Naira, Eleven Kobo (19,912,338,899.11).

Six Hundred and Thirty Four million, Eight Hundred and Eleven Thousand naira (634,811,000.00) came in as cash deposits from 1,056 investors while Three Fifty Million, Eight Hundred and Twenty million naira (350,820,000.00) were 36 bank-to-bank “transfers from Micheno Multipurpose Cooperative Society, Stanbic account”

Ten “transfers from Micheno Multipurpose Cooperative Society, GTBank” were made totalling

Fourteen Million, Five Hundred and Fifty million naira (14,550,000.00) while Two million, Nine Hundred and Twenty Nine Thousand, One Hundred and Ninety-One naira, Fifty-Three kobo was “interest on time deposit.”

Similarly, “Micheno Multipurpose Cooperative Society (Naira Account -0346460004) recorded a total turnover of about N26 billion (excluding reversals)”.

The bank added that “there were no transactions in the three domiciliary accounts since inception. The domiciliary accounts are”Micheno Multipurposes Cooperative Society (Domiciliary Accounts – 0346460011, 0346460028, 0346460035).”

GTB admitted it received several correspondences from law enforcement agencies in respect of Micheno Ventures and Micheno Mutipurpose Coorperative Society but added that “it is possible that the interest of law enforcement agencies may have been triggered by the Suspicious Transaction Reports filed by the bank.”

BUSINESS LEAKS gathered that law enforcement’s attention to Micheno was drawn by petitions from wearied investors led by one Adindu M. Ohawwe and Ojima Daniel on behalf of 1123 other petitioners.

The bank deflected accusations of poor due diligence, particularly the allegation that banks allowed Mr. Michael Eke to be the sole signatory to Micheno Multipurpose Cooperative Society Ltd’s accounts and dissipated funds without recourse to other members. GTB said the Cooperative’s account had three signatories and not one as alleged by the aggrieved investors. It however added that the account of Micheno Ventures is a sole proprietorship account which was “solely administered by Uno Michael Eke, being the sole proprietor.”

Another oversight lapses alleged by the investors is that Micheno Cooperative Society Limited is registered as a society with its activities limited to the Federal Capital Territory as specified in article 2.3 of its constitution but operated its head office in Calabar, Cross River State. To this, GTB responded that “there is no legal or regulatory provision limiting the society and indeed any entity in Nigeria from opening an account in other locations aside from their primary place of business.”

The bank concluded that it “empathize with the subscribers of Micheno Multipurpose Cooperative Society who appear to have lost their hard earned funds in this debacle.” However it added that “it is pertinent to state that every investment activity incorporates an element of risk, which we suspect the subscribers should have been fully aware of by carrying out their enhanced due diligence before subscribing.”

Responses from other banks associated with Micheno are not as detailed, perhaps in reflection of the relatively low volume of transactions they recorded with the investment company. They only virtually provided basic information on Micheno’s account mandate and statements of accounts.

Investors fight back

Many of the investors, unwilling to accept the humongous losses they attribute to bank negligence, have been seeking ways to recover some of their funds and /or to at least put the Micheno operators behind bars. Though a mass action was initiated by over 1,000 subscribers, a few of them with contacts in high places resorted to individual efforts.

One of them is Ms Briggs Nimi Osim who invested N47 million in one of Micheno’s investment packages called SwissGolden. Her efforts succeeded in remanding Micheno’s chief promoter, Uno Michael Eke, in prison custody for a while.

On two occasions, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) dragged Eke to the Federal High Court, Calabar, Cross River State. BUSINESS LEAKS gathered that “a few powerful investors” including top government functionaries of Cross River State, especially commissioners and aides of the governor exerted insurmountable pressure on the banks and EFCC officials and were able to recover part of their funds.

In a curious twist to the saga, Uno Michael Eke who investors also accused of exporting their funds overseas blamed his woes on conspiracy of commercial banks which he said became jittery as increasing numbers of depositors pulled out monies from their accounts to invest in Micheno. Ekeh added that he reinvested investors’ funds in Swiss gold but that his foreign adventure took a hit from a sudden policy change on fund conversion in the host country.

This investigation was carried out under the Collaborative Media Engagement for Development Inclusivity and Accountability Project of the WSCIJ, with funding from the MacArthur Foundation.

More to articles

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *